The time of compulsary AI use at work is starting

Version Details

Model: N/a

Summary:

This is a short article and the interpretation is very personal, so it was easier to just write this one myself.

On 8 April 2025, the CEO of Shopify released an internal memo to staff on X.com, after it was leaked.

The full memo is shown below, but they summary is that all staff are now required to use AI as a “reflexive” action in all things they do. They have been given all of the AI tools they need, and are expected to understand and use them for everything.

The other key message is this:

“Before asking for more Headcount and resources, teams must demonstrate why they cannot get what they want done using AI.”

While this doesn’t say that they will start replacing staff with AI, it’s almost certain they will, and it’s just as likely that will start with the staff who are slowest to adopt AI.

This has people talking, but I have no doubt this will quickly become common place. I personally would not hire someone who hadn’t adopted AI in any role that involves a large amount of knowledge work. This clearly applies for coding roles, but there isn’t a role in a tech company where I can’t see AI increasing everyone’s productivity by 50% to 200% or more.

For a time there are going to be a lot of people pushing back against this, possibly even you as you read this. But I doubt you will get much push back from anyone who has fully adopted AI because the benefits are very clear and very significant.

If you think that firing staff for not using AI is harsh, what about an employee who refused to use computers at work? What if they preferred a typewriter for writing and regular mail for communication? I doubt you would allow that for any staff involved in knowledge work, but AI is just another form of technology and I have no doubt that refusing to learn and use AI will quickly become just as crazy as refusing to use a computer.

So, while I might not agree with every single statement in the memo, such as the claim of some staff getting 100X (not 100%) increases in productivity in some tasks, I completely agree that the time for “reflexive” use of AI has already arrived and anyone not using AI for almost everything they do on a computer is already starting to fall behind those who do.

To wrap this up, the question often comes back to “when will AI replace humans”. That is not the important question for businesses. The question is how productive can someone be when using AI versus someone who isn’t. If you have a team of five doctors, lawyers, marketers, coders, creatives or engineers, if four people with AI can do the work of five people and you can save 20%, wouldn’t you want to do that. (Clearly if you can have five people do the work of six and you have the revenue to support that, you should, but that is still one person who would have been hired but now won’t be). What about if three can do the work of five? Or two? Or even one? We are a long way off AI being able to replace that last person, but in some areas it is already possible for one person to do the work of five if they make heavy use of AI.

And remember… AI today is the worst it will be going forward. So even if AI can’t replace four people in every team of five, that time is almost certainly coming, maybe faster than you think.